Summer 2015 (29.2) Essay

Against Moral Absolutism: Surveillance and Disclosure After Snowden

Now that the uproar provoked by the disclosure of the National Security Agency’s (NSA) surveillance programs has lessened, and the main protagonists, Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald, have had a chance to make the case for their actions, we are in a position to evaluate whether their disclosure and publication of communications intelligence was justified. To this end, this essay starts by clarifying the history, rationale, and efficacy of communications surveillance. Following this I weigh the arguments against surveillance, focusing in particular on the countervailing value of privacy. Next I explain why state secrecy makes it difficult for citizens and lawmakers to assess the balance that officials are striking between security and privacy. Finally, I turn to consider whether the confounding nature of state secrecy justifies Snowden’s and Greenwald’s actions. I conclude that their actions are unjustified because they treat privacy and transparency as trumps. Consequently, their actions embody a moral absolutism that disrespects the norms and procedures central to a constitutional democracy.

To read the full article, click here.

More in this issue

Summer 2015 (29.2) Essay

Innocents Abroad? Liberal Educators in Illiberal Societies

JIM SLEEPER Is anything in liberal education nonnegotiable? With numerous expansions abroad, American universities are testing these limits.

Summer 2015 (29.2) Interview

An Interview with Jim Sleeper on the Future of Liberal Education

JIM SLEEPER AND ZACH DORFMAN In this EIA interview, Jim Sleeper, author of "Innocents Abroad: Liberal Educators in Illiberal Societies," talks about the expansion of ...

Summer 2015 (29.2) Feature

The Idea of Universality in the Sustainable Development Goals

Despite an apparent “emerging consensus that the post-2015 agenda should be universal,” there is less agreement over what universality means, and how this demand should ...