This paper develops a critical analysis of deliberative approaches to global governance. After first defining global governance and with a minimalist conception of deliberation in mind, the paper outlines three paradigmatic approaches: liberal, cosmopolitan, and critical. The possibilities and problems of each approach are examined and a common concern with the scope for "deliberative reflection" in global governance is addressed.
It is argued that each approach, to varying degrees, foregrounds the currently underdetermined state of knowledge about global governance, its key institutions, agents, and practices. In doing so, the question "What is global governance?" is retained as an important and reflective element of ongoing deliberative practices. It is suggested that this constitutes the distinctive and vital insight of deliberative approaches to global governance.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
More in this issue
Spring 2008 (22.1) • Feature
Torture and the "Distributive Justice" Theory of Self-Defense: An Assessment
The goal of this feature is to demonstrate that distributive justice is a flawed theory of self-defense and must be rejected, thus undercutting the argument ...
Spring 2008 (22.1) • Review
Briefly Noted
This section contains a round-up of recent notable books in the field of international affairs.
Spring 2008 (22.1) • Feature
Justifications of the Iraq War Examined
This paper critically assesses three claims on behalf of the Iraq war made by the Bush administration and by various defenders of the war. Then ...