In this essay I explore three questions that capture the broad outlines of climate concerns. First, what is the nature of climate change as a global problem? Second, what frustrates humanity’s ability to respond? Third, what can be done?
The character of climate change is such that it would be naïve to think that humans can easily solve it. Despite significant domestic and international efforts over the past few decades, greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise and show little sign of abating. Given this fact, moral action must be understood not exclusively in instrumental terms—as if it were simply a tool in the service of climate stability—but as an intrinsically worthwhile undertaking. Climate change offers the opportunity for humans to care about each other and the nonhuman world in new ways. Accepting this invitation can enable people to practice moral action independent of whether their efforts actually make a material difference. This is important since the window for promising mitigation and adaptation efforts is quickly closing. The world is dashing toward greater and more devastating climate intensification. Nonetheless, opportunities for moral action abound. Embracing these opportunities may well come to define what it means to be fully human in an age of climate change.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
More in this issue
Fall 2014 (28.3) • Review
The Vulnerable in International Society by Ian Clark
As Clark shows, order is much more than balancing, deterrence, diplomacy, peace, and war. How international society manages global problems should be of major concern ...
Fall 2014 (28.3) • Essay
A Call for a Global Constitutional Convention Focused on Future Generations
The climate problem is usually misdiagnosed as a traditional tragedy of the commons, but this obscures two deeper and distinctively ethical challenges. We must call ...
Fall 2014 (28.3) • Essay
Who Are Atrocity’s “Real” Perpetrators, Who Its “True” Victims and Beneficiaries?
Modern law’s response to mass atrocities vacillates equivocally in how it understands the dramatis personae to these expansive tragedies, at once extraordinary and ubiquitous.