The prospects for global democracy are starting to receive serious attention from scholars and political reformers alike. Working on the premise that global electoral democracy is not feasible, I will identify and compare three emerging ways of thinking about democracy in global politics—ways that I refer to as a soup, a society, and a system. Briefly, a soup refers to the proliferation of democratic practices within existing patterns of international politics; a society has a set of constitutive norms and discourses that might be more or less democratic in their content, production, evolution, and interchange; and a system is composed of differentiated and ordered components linked to the production of collective outcomes, and might therefore seem the obvious objective when it comes to democratic innovation in international politics.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
More in this issue
![](https://cdn.carnegiecouncil.org/media/eia/_900x525_crop_center-center_none_ns/Liberal-Loyalty-Freedom-Obligation-and-the-State.jpg?v=1721238891)
Summer 2011 (25.2) • Review
Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State by Anna Stilz
In this highly engaging book, Anna Stilz seeks to offer a liberal solution to the problem of political obligations. As she points out, a liberal ...
Summer 2011 (25.2) • Response
Online Exclusive: Choosing What to Do in Afghanistan: A Reply by Richard W. Miller [Full Text]
Summer 2011 (25.2) • Review
Briefly Noted [Full Text]
This section contains a round-up of recent notable books in the field of international affairs.