Abstract: India is gradually changing its course from decades of inward-looking economics and strong anti-Western foreign policies. It has become more pragmatic, seeing important economic benefits from globalization, and some political benefits of working with the United States to achieve New Delhi’s great-power aspirations. Despite these changes, I argue that India’s deep-seated anti-colonial nationalism and commitment to strategic autonomy continues to form the core of Indian identity. This makes India’s commitment to Western-dominated multilateral institutions and Western norms, such as humanitarian intervention, partial and instrumental. Thus, while Indian foreign-policy discourse shows little sign of seeking to fully challenge the U.S.-led international order beyond largely reformist measures of building parallel institutions such as the New Development Bank, India will continue to strongly resist Western actions that weaken sovereignty norms.
Keywords: rising powers, strategic autonomy, Indian foreign policy, India and multilateralism, G-20, BRICS
The full essay is available to subscribers only. Click here for access.
More in this issue
Spring 2018 (32.1) • Essay
China and the Future International Order(s)
China sees no need for, and hence does not seek, fundamental transformation of the existing order. Rather, it seeks piecemeal modification.
Spring 2018 (32.1) • Essay
Russia and the Liberal World Order
The question of Russia’s desire to change a liberal international order hangs on the type of liberalism embedded in that order. Moreover, despite some ...
Spring 2018 (32.1) • Essay
Why the Liberal World Order Will Survive
This essay offers an evolutionary perspective of international order and argues that although America’s hegemonic position may be declining, the liberal international characteristics of ...