Summer 2008 (22.2) Feature

Just War Theory and the Privatization of Military Force

The use of private military companies (PMCs) has become increasingly prevalent, with such firms as Blackwater, MPRI, and DynCorp taking over a growing number of roles traditionally performed by the regular military. This article uses the framework of just war theory (JWT) to consider the central normative issues raised by this privatization of military force.

In particular, I first examine the claim that private contractors are inappropriate actors to wage war because they contravene the JWT principle of right intention.

The next section asserts that the use of PMCs is largely consistent with the application of the principle of legitimate authority but undermines two of its central rationales.

In the third section, I apply the jus in bello principle of discrimination to PMC personnel. Overall, I argue that JWT needs to be updated and extended to respond to the issues raised by the privatization of military force.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

More in this issue

Summer 2008 (22.2) Essay

The Elusive Rights of an Invisible Population

Carens's suggestion for a so-called firewall protecting irregular migrants' basic rights creates serious problems of coherence and feasibility for the legal and political systems of ...

Summer 2008 (22.2) Review

A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy by J. Timmons Roberts and Bradley C. Parks

Part of what makes Roberts and Parks's argument unusual and original is not the end point—that ultimately we will all need to radically cut ...

Summer 2008 (22.2) Review

International Legitimacy and World Society by Ian Clark

Clark seems caught not just between two concepts—international and world society—but between his two goals: the historical goal of recovering the politics of ...