Summer 2009 (23.2) Feature

Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of Jus Post Bellum [Abstract]

Recently, strong arguments have been offered for the inclusion of jus post bellum in just war theory. If this addition is indeed justified, it is plain that, due to the variety in types of post-conflict situation, the content of jus post bellum will necessarily vary. One instance when it looks as if it should become "extended" in its scope, ranging well beyond (for example) issues of "just peace terms," is when occupation of a defeated enemy is necessary.

In this situation, this article argues that an engagement by jus post bellum with the morality of post-conflict reconstruction is unavoidable. However, the resulting extension of jus post bellum's stipulations threatens to generate conflict with another tenet that it would surely wish to endorse with respect to "just occupation," namely, that sovereignty or self-determination should be restored to the occupied people as soon as is reasonably possible. Hence, the action-guiding objective of the theory could become significantly problematized. The article concludes by considering whether this problem supports the claim that the addition of jus post bellum to just war theory is actually more problematic than its supporters have realized.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

More in this issue

Summer 2009 (23.2) Essay

The Global War on Terror: A Narrative in Need of a Rewrite

This essay focuses on how the global war on terror was constructed and how it has set down deep institutional roots both in government and ...

Summer 2009 (23.2) Feature

The Imperative to Rebuild: Assessing the Normative Case for Postconflict Reconstruction

In view of the recent growth of peacebuilding and reconstruction missions, and the serious challenges and crises that have plagued them, the authors construct a ...

Summer 2009 (23.2) Feature

The Norms and Politics of Exit: Ending Postconflict Transitional Administrations

This paper examines the impact of the liberal-democratic norms governing statebuilding operations on the timing and process of exit of post-conflict international transitional administrations.