Winter 2013 (27.4) Essay

Muslim Discourse on Rebellion

Within Islamic thought, the judgments pertaining to rebels constitute a subset of the larger category of “judgments pertaining to armed struggle” (ahkam al-jihad). Indeed, one might refer to the latter as the overarching name for a Muslim war convention, which would then include judgments pertaining to military actions intended to: (a) extend or enhance the territory in which Islam provides governance or serves as the established religion of state; (b) defend the Islamic territory against invaders; and (c) regulate the relations between various groups within the territory of Islam, including (i) ahl al-dhimma, the “protected” class of non-Muslims (Christians, Jews, and others), (ii) apostates (Muslims who stand accused of abandoning Islam), (iii) highwaymen and other renegades, and (iv) secessionists and rebels (ahl al-khawarij wa al-bughat).

As we consider Muslim discourse about rebellion, it is worth summarizing some of the salient features of this latter tradition.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

More in this issue

Winter 2013 (27.4) Review

On Complicity and Compromise by Chiara Lepora and Robert E. Goodin

Humanitarian action is regularly accused of prolonging wars or colluding with vicious regimes. But the profession has been strangely tardy in developing its operational ethics.

Winter 2013 (27.4) Feature

On Rights to Land, Expulsions, and Corrective Justice

This article examines the nature of the wrongs that are inflicted on individuals and groups who have been expelled from the land that they previously ...

Winter 2013 (27.4) Feature

Sovereign Wealth Funds and Global Justice

Insofar as ethical debates have begun to touch on how the assets of sovereign wealth funds should be distributed, they have tended to ask how ...