My goal here is twofold: First, I wish to make a plea for the relevance of moral considerations in debates about immigration. Too often, immigration debates are conducted solely from the standpoint of "what is good for us," without regard for the justifiability of immigration policies to those excluded. Second, I wish to offer a standpoint that demonstrates why one should think of immigration as a moral problem that must be considered in the context of global justice. More specifically, I will argue that the earth belongs to humanity in common and that this matters for assessing immigration policy. The case I will be particularly interested in is immigration into the United States, where immigration policy continues to be a hotly debated topic. However, that discussion takes the form of a case study: the relevant considerations apply generally.
To read or purchase the full text, click here.
More in this issue
Spring 2008 (22.1) • Essay
Can There Be a "Kindered" Peace?
Arguably, children are among those most affected by contemporary models of conflict. Yet their plight is little discussed when it comes to agreeing on the ...
Spring 2008 (22.1) • Feature
Torture and the "Distributive Justice" Theory of Self-Defense: An Assessment
The goal of this feature is to demonstrate that distributive justice is a flawed theory of self-defense and must be rejected, thus undercutting the argument ...
Spring 2008 (22.1) • Review
Briefly Noted
This section contains a round-up of recent notable books in the field of international affairs.