Winter 2017 (31.4) Essay

On the Relationship Between the Ethics and the Law of War: Cyber Operations and Sublethal Harm

Abstract: Why do we need dialogue between ethical and legal perspectives on norms governing the initiation and conduct of interstate conflict? This essay will examine this question by first critiquing the 2013 Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, which sought to apply existing legal frameworks that govern international violence to a new form of conflict. While the manual is for the most part ethically commendable, the first half of the essay will highlight several of its ethical shortcomings and will then extract general reasons why international law nevertheless must be informed by ethical analysis. The second part of the essay will affirm the importance of law for ethical analyses of justified responses to the burgeoning phenomenon of sublethal harm. While states have always used sublethal harm to weaken adversaries, technological developments have magnified the regularity and effectiveness of these practices, particularly against free societies. Responses to such attacks may include—in addition to defensive countermeasures—punishments that deter and reform, and may target “indirect participants” such as financial supporters. However, determining which responses are ethically justified will require insights gleaned from criminal and tort law.

Keywords: cyber warfare, sublethal harm, Tallinn Manual, jus ad bellum, jus in bello, international law, just war theory

Full essay available to subscribers only. Click here for access.

More in this issue

Winter 2017 (31.4) Essay

Just War Theory and the Laws of War as Nonidentical Twins

In this essay, David Luban examines the similarities, but even more the dissimilarities, between just war theory and the laws of war. Specifically, he argues ...

Winter 2017 (31.4) Feature

Carbon Emissions, Stratospheric Aerosol Injection, and Unintended Harms

In this article, Christopher J. Preston compares the culpability for any unintended harms resulting from stratospheric aerosol injection versus culpability for the unintended harms already ...

Winter 2017 (31.4) Essay

The Need for Governance of Climate Geoengineering

In this essay, Janos Pasztor explains some of the major ethical issues surrounding geoengineering and introduces the Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative, a major new ...