Summer 2017 (31.2) Essay

Securing Protection for De Facto Refugees: The Case of Central America’s Northern Triangle

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reports that the number of requests for international refugee or asylum protection increased fivefold from 2010 to 2015. In the United States these requests are mainly filed by citizens from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras—the countries collectively referred to as the Northern Triangle of Central America (TNCA). These applicants flee their countries of origin to escape threats to their lives and personal safety from gang violence, organized crime, and even police and military agents. Though the violence cannot be classified as a “war,” the daily life of many Central Americans is currently marked by human tragedies comparable to those experienced during the regional armed conflicts of past decades.

Despite these extreme conditions, protective status is almost always denied to those fleeing this violence because the threats facing the applicants are not those covered by the definition of a refugee codified in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. The source of these tragedies is defined in some academic circles as “unconventional violence,” that is, violence generated by nonstate actors outside an official context of war or armed conflict. In the absence of wars or internal conflicts involving state actors, traditional aid and humanitarian action mechanisms are difficult to activate: in other words, because the persecuted are not victimized by government agents due to membership in a protected group, they do not qualify for refugee status. The situation is further aggravated by the reluctance of governments to acknowledge the seriousness of the threats to their own civilians and to take urgent measures to establish response mechanisms. This violence represents a challenge that must be addressed at the structural level. Failure to do so will perpetuate the environment of impunity, corruption, and inequality, and will further the elimination of institutions that are so indispensable to democracy. Most importantly, the new scenarios of widespread violence in Central America make it necessary to clarify and broaden the definition of a refugee.

Full essay available to subscribers only. Click here for access.

More in this issue

Summer 2017 (31.2) Feature

Introduction: Legitimate Authority, War, and the Ethics of Rebellion

The three articles in this special section all investigate the idea that considerations of “legitimate authority” have a key role in constituting the modern idea ...

Summer 2017 (31.2) Essay

A Better Process, a Stronger UN Secretary-General: How Historic Change Was Forged and What Comes Next

In the past, UN secretaries-general were chosen on the basis of a haphazard and secretive process behind closed doors. Yet over the last two years, ...

Summer 2017 (31.2) Feature

Does Who Matter? Legal Authority and the Use of Military Violence

In this article, Pål Wrange demonstrates that in international law there is no consistent, over-arching conception of proper authority. Instead, he concludes, there exists ...