Does humanity have a moral obligation toward the estimated millions of individuals who will be displaced from their homes over the course of this century primarily due to sea-level rise as the earth's climate warms? If there are indeed sound reasons for the world to act on their behalf, what form should these actions take?
This paper discusses the disproportionate accumulation, delayed effects, and asymmetrical impacts arising from the release of greenhouse gases, and advances ethical arguments concerning why and how the global community of nations can address the injustices caused by historic and continuing actions on these climate migrants and climate exiles.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
More in this issue
Fall 2010 (24.3) • Feature
Reviving Nuclear Ethics: A Renewed Research Agenda for the Twenty-First Century
Since the end of the Cold War, international ethicists have focused largely on issues outside the traditional scope of security studies. The nuclear ethics literature ...
Fall 2010 (24.3) • Review
New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding, edited by Edward Newman, Roland Paris, and Oliver P. Richmond
This edited volume moves beyond the more common analyses of what works and what does not in building sustainable peace in order to raise deeper ...
Fall 2010 (24.3) • Essay
Just War, Jihad, and the Study of Comparative Ethics
What can the study of the comparative ethics tell us about the similarities and divergences between the just war and jihad traditions? How can the ...