Summer 2007 (21.2) Feature

The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy

Despite some limited moves toward openness and accountability, suprastate policy formation in such bodies as the World Trade Organization remains fundamentally exclusive of individuals within states. This article critiques the "don't kill the goose" arguments commonly offered in defense of such exclusions. It highlights similarities between those arguments and past arguments for elitist forms of democracy, where strict limitations are advocated on the participation of non-elites in the name of allowing leaders to act most effectively in the broad public interest. Advocated here is movement toward a strongly empowered WTO parliamentary body that would be guided in practice by a principle of democratic symmetry, attempting to match input to the increasing impacts of WTO governance. A parliament with co-decision powers broadly similar to those of the European Parliament is offered as a long-term institutional ideal.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

More in this issue

Summer 2007 (21.2) Internal

Editors' Note [Full Text]

Sometimes change is revolutionary, but more often it tends to be evolutionary. That is why many readers might not even notice that there are a ...

Summer 2007 (21.2) Feature

Liability and Just Cause

This paper is a response to Jeff McMahan's "Just Cause for War" (EIA, 19.3, 2005). It defends a more permissive, and more traditional view of just war ...

Summer 2007 (21.2) Review

Law, Politics, and Morality in Judaism edited by Michael Walzer

This volume of collected essays by Michael Walzer seeks to bring a more concentrated focus on specifically Jewish outlooks regarding three key themes: "Political Order ...