Summer 2018 (32.2) Review Essay

The Irony of Just War

Abstract: By claiming that “just war is just war,” critics suggest that just war theory both distracts from and sanitizes the horror of modern warfare by dressing it up in the language of moral principles. However, the phrase can also be taken as a reminder of why we need just war theory in the first place. It is precisely because just war is just war, with all that this implies, that we must think so carefully and so judiciously about it. Of course, one could argue that the rump of just war scholarship over the past decade has been characterized by disinterest regarding the material realities of warfare. But is this still the case? This essay examines a series of benchmark books on the ethics of war published over the past year. All three exemplify an effort to grapple with the hard facts of modern violent conflict, and they all skillfully bring diverse traditions of just war thinking into conversation with one another.

Keywords: just war, realism, Michael Walzer, Thomas Aquinas

Full review essay available to subscribers only. Click here for access.

More in this issue

Summer 2018 (32.2) Review Essay

Toward a Global Water Ethic: Learning from Indigenous Communities

This review essay draws on three important new contributions to the water governance literature to suggest that insights from indigenous communities’ more holistic and long-term ...

Summer 2018 (32.2) Review

Just War Thinkers: From Cicero to the 21st Century, edited by Daniel R. Brunstetter and Cian O’Driscoll

This volume provides an overview of the development of just war thinking over the centuries through a series of contextualized snapshots of individuals whose work ...

Summer 2018 (32.2) Feature

Threats and Coercive Diplomacy: An Ethical Analysis

Threats of armed force are frequently employed in international affairs, yet they have received little ethical scrutiny in their own right. This article addresses that ...