Spring 2019 (33.1) Review Essay

The Many Evils of Inequality: An Examination of T. M. Scanlon’s Pluralist Account

Abstract: Why Does Inequality Matter? is the long-awaited book-length development of T. M. Scanlon’s views on objectionable inequality, and our obligations to eliminate or reduce it. The book presents an impressively nuanced and thoughtful analysis as well as succinct explanations of different objections to various forms of inequality. It is not only set to further cement Scanlon’s influence on philosophical debates about equality but also makes a good guide to the problems of inequality for the nonspecialist reader. The book is not without faults, however. Even within a pluralist approach to inequality such as Scanlon’s, it is not sufficiently clear what, if anything, his specific objections to status inequality, and to control over other people’s lives, have in common with his other egalitarian objections to inequality of political influence, opportunity, and income and wealth—or whether, in the case of control, the objection is egalitarian at all.

Keywords: T. M. Scanlon, equality, inequality, pluralism, status, control

A full version of this review essay is available to subscribers only. Click here for access.

More in this issue

Spring 2019 (33.1) Response

Could a United Nations Code of Conduct Help Curb Atrocities? A Response to Bolarinwa Adediran

Although a UN code of conduct may have little effect on Security Council decision-making, the proposals have already proven their worth in political and normative ...

Spring 2019 (33.1) Essay

Unresolved and Unresolvable? Tensions in the Refugee Regime

Advancing durable solutions does not necessarily mean overcoming the inherent tensions in the refugee regime between law, morality, and national interests.

Spring 2019 (33.1) Essay

Humor, Ethics, and Dignity: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

This essay explores humans’ unique ability to understand context, something that is evident in both humor and ethics, and something that AI lacks.