Summer 2016 (30.2) Essay

When Democracies Denationalize: The Epistemological Case against Revoking Citizenship

Discomfort with denationalization spans both proceduralist and consequentialist objections. I augment Patti Lenard’s arguments against denationalization with an epistemological argument. What makes denationalization problematic for democratic theorists are not simply the procedures used to impose this penalty or its consequences but also the permanence of this type of punishment. Because democratic theory assumes citizens to be subject to developmental processes that can substantially alter a person’s character in politically relevant ways, I argue in favor of states imposing only revocable punishments. Penalties removing people’s rights and political standing must be accompanied by avenues for periodic reconsideration of such punishments in order to meet Lenard’s standard of democratic legitimacy.

Full article available to subscribers only. Access the article here.

More in this issue

Summer 2016 (30.2) Essay

The Democratic Roots of Expatriation

Patti Tamara Lenard assesses the justifications given for the right to revoke citizenship in democratic states and concludes that this practice is inconsistent with a ...

Summer 2016 (30.2) Essay

Transformative Equality: Making the Sustainable Development Goals Work for Women

It is generally agreed by most observers that the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have fallen short of achieving gender equality and women’s empowerment. Today, ...

Summer 2016 (30.2) Feature

Rethinking Central Bank Accountability in Uncertain Times

As the dust has settled following the 2008 financial crisis and the economic dislocations that ensued, it has become clear that central banks have gained considerably ...